

EC FINANCE MINISTERS' DISCUSSION OF GOLD, APRIL 22-23 | |
1974 April 25, 12:06 (Thursday) |
1974ECBRU02457_b |
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE |
UNCLASSIFIED |
-- N/A or Blank -- |
5226 |
-- N/A or Blank -- |
TEXT ON MICROFILM,TEXT ONLINE |
-- N/A or Blank -- |
TE |
-- N/A or Blank -- ACTION EUR |
Electronic Telegrams |
Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 30 JUN 2005 |
|
Belgium Brussels | Denmark Copenhagen | Department of State | France Paris | Germany Bonn | Ireland Dublin | Italy Rome | Japan Tokyo | Luxembourg Luxembourg | Netherlands The Hague | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Paris) | Secretary of State | Sweden Stockholm | Switzerland Bern | United Kingdom London |
Content
Raw content
Metadata
Raw source
Print
Share
Find
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
PAGE 02 EC BRU 02457 251418Z
B) EC BRUSSELS 2208 (NOTAL)
C) EC BRUSSELS 1808 (NOTAL)
1. SUMMARY: ACCORDING TO PERMREP AND COMMISSION SOURCES,
THE INFORMAL UNDERSTANDING REACHED BY THE EC FINANCE
MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS APRIL 22-23 PROVIDED
THAT A) CENTRAL BANKS SHOULD BE PREMITTED FREELY TO BUY
AND SELL GOLD--AMONG THEMSELVES AND ON THE MARKET-- AT
PRICES OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL PRICE; B) THAT PURCHASES
FROM THE FREE MARKET SHOULD NOT LEAD TO ANY INCREASE IN
WORLD MONETARY GOLD STOCKS; AND C) THAT THERE SHOULD BE
EARLY CONSULTATIONS WITH THE U.S. AND AN EFFORT TO REACH
AGREEMENT IN THE C-20 ON THIS UNDERSTANDING. END SUMMARY.
2. EC COMMISSION AND PERMREP SOURCES HAVE BRIEFED THE
MISSION ON THE MEETING OF EC FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL
BANK GOVERNORS AT ZEIST. THESE CONTACTS EITHER WERE PRESENT AT
THE MEETING OR HAVE HAD ACCESS TO PARTICIPANTS. THEIR
ACCOUNTS ARE GENERALLY IN ACCORD WITH THAT OBTAINED BY
EMBASSY THE HAGUE.
3. EC COMMISSION SOURCES TELL US THAT THE UNDERSTANDING
REACHED BY THE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS
CORRESPONDS TO THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN A REPORT PREPARED BY
THE CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS FOR THE ZEIST MEETING. THIS
REPORT STATED THAT CENTRAL BANKS SHOULD BE PERMITTED BOTH
TO SELL AND TO BUY GOLD EITHER AMONGST EACH OTHER OR ON
THE MARKET AT AT PRICE OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL PRICE AND
THAT, FURTHER, THEY SHOULD HAVE COMPLETE FREEDOM OF
DECISION TO BUY OR TO SELL WITHOUT OBLIGATION TO ENGAGE
IN ANY PARTICULAR TRANSACTION. COMMISSION SOURCES
STRESSED THE POINT THAT ANY TRANSACTIONS IN GOLD WOULD BE
STRICTLY OPTIONAL. THEY ALSO NOTED THAT PARTICIPANTS IN
THE ZEIST MEETING MADE CLEAR THEIR INTENTION TO AVOID ANY
REMONETIZATION OF GOLD. OUR CONTACTS SAID THERE WAS
AGREEMENT THAT THE CENTRAL BANKS AS A WHOLE WOULD NOT BE
NET ACCUMULATORS OF GOLD BUT THERE WAS NO QUESTION OF
MAKING THIS OBLIGATION BINDING ON INDIVIDUAL CENTRAL BANKS
AS INDICATED IN REF A.
4. THE MINISTERS AND GOVERNORS ALSO DISCUSSED CERTAIN
SPECIFIC FEATURES THAT MIGHT EVENTUALLY BE INTRODUCED INTO
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
PAGE 03 EC BRU 02457 251418Z
THE SYSTEM BUT THAT WOULD REQUIRE FURTHER STUDY. THESE ARE:
A) AMOVABLE BAND COORDINATED BY THE CENTRAL BANKS WITH A
CEILING FOR PURCHASES AND A FLOOR FOR SALES; AND B) SOME
KIND OF AN INTERMEDIARY THROUGH WHICH MARKET INTERVENTIONS
MIGHT BE CHANNELED--POSSIBLY IN THE FORM OF A BUFFER STOCK.
THESE "MODALITIES" WILL ALSO BE DISCUSSED WITH THE U.S.,
BUT THEY ARE NOT CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF ANY
REVISED ARRANGEMENTS FOR GOLD.
5. AS REPORTED IN REF A, THE MEETING DEPUTIZED DUTCH
FINANCE MINISTER DUISENBERG AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNOR
ZIJLSTRA TO CONSULT WITH U.S. TREASURY AND FED OFFICIALS.
WE UNDERSTAND DUTCH TREASURER GENERAL OORT WAS ALSO
CHARGED WITH RAISING THE POINTS AT THE C-20 DEPUTIES
MEETING MAY 7. THE DUTCH WILL REPORT ANY U.S. REACTION
TO THE EC FINANCE MINISTERS, WHO ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET
AS A COUNCIL IN BRUSSELS MAY 20. IF THERE IS NO AGREEMENT
IN THE C-20, THE POINTS OF UNDERSTANDING REACHED AT ZEIST
WOULD NOT AUTOMATICALLY BE APPLIED WITHIN THE EC. RATHER,
THE ENTIRE ISSUE WOULD HAVE TO BE RECONSIDERED.
6. COMMISSION SOURCES TELL US THE PARTICIPANTS AT ZEIST
AGREED THAT CONTACTS ENVISAGED WITH THE U.S. WOULD BE IN
THE FRAMEWORK OF DISCUSSION AND CONSULTATION RATHER THAN
NEGOTIATION. (THE FRENCH REPORTEDLY SPECIFICALLY STATED
THERE SHOULD BE NO "NEGOTIATIONS", AND THIS POINT WAS
ACCEPTED BY THE OTHER PARTICIPANTS.)
7. IN COMMENTING ON THE DISCUSSIONS AT ZEIST, ONE SOURCE
WHO WAS PRESENT AT THE MEETING TOLD US THE VIEW WAS WIDE-
SPREAD THAT AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, CENTRAL BANKS WOULD NOT
SELL GOLD UNLESS THEY KNEW THEY COULD BUY. FREEDOM TO
SELL BUT NOT TO BUY WAS MEANINGLESS SINCE THE PRICE COULD
NOT BE CONTROLLED AND A NATION THAT SOLD GOLD WOULD
SIMPLY UNDERCUT ITS OWN POSITION IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY
BUYING. MOREOVER, IF THE PHASING OUT OF HOLD WAS TO
BE ORDERLY, CENTRAL BANKS WOULD REQUIRE FREEDOM TO
OPERATE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. FINALLY, THE POINT WAS
MADE AT THE MEETING THAT NON-MONETARY COMMODITIES ARE
BOTH BOUGHT AND SOLD ON THE MARKET AND THAT GOLD, IF
REGARDED AS A NON-MONETARY COMMODITY, SHOULD BE TREATED
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
PAGE 04 EC BRU 02457 251418Z
SIMILARLY. MYERSON
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
NNN
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
PAGE 01 EC BRU 02457 251418Z
43
ACTION EUR-25
INFO OCT-01 EA-11 ISO-00 EURE-00 SP-03 AID-20 EB-11 NSC-07
RSC-01 CIEP-02 TRSE-00 SS-20 STR-08 OMB-01 CEA-02
CIAE-00 COME-00 FRB-02 INR-10 NSAE-00 XMB-07 OPIC-12
LAB-06 SIL-01 L-03 H-03 PA-04 PRS-01 USIA-15 ABF-01
FS-01 DRC-01 /179 W
--------------------- 061883
P R 251206Z APR 74
FM US MISSION EC BRUSSELS
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6769
INFO AMEMBASSY BERN
AMEMBASSY BONN
AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS
AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN
AMEMBASSY DUBLIN
AMEMBASSY LONDON
AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG
AMEMBASSY PARIS
AMEMBASSY ROME
AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM
AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
AMEMBASSY TOKYO
USMISSION OECD PARIS
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE EC BRUSSELS 2457
PASS TREASURY, FRB, CEA
E.O. 11652: N/A
TAGS: EFIN, EEC
SUBJ: EC FINANCE MINISTERS' DISCUSSION OF GOLD,
APRIL 22-23
REFS: A) THE HAGUE 2042
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
PAGE 02 EC BRU 02457 251418Z
B) EC BRUSSELS 2208 (NOTAL)
C) EC BRUSSELS 1808 (NOTAL)
1. SUMMARY: ACCORDING TO PERMREP AND COMMISSION SOURCES,
THE INFORMAL UNDERSTANDING REACHED BY THE EC FINANCE
MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS APRIL 22-23 PROVIDED
THAT A) CENTRAL BANKS SHOULD BE PREMITTED FREELY TO BUY
AND SELL GOLD--AMONG THEMSELVES AND ON THE MARKET-- AT
PRICES OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL PRICE; B) THAT PURCHASES
FROM THE FREE MARKET SHOULD NOT LEAD TO ANY INCREASE IN
WORLD MONETARY GOLD STOCKS; AND C) THAT THERE SHOULD BE
EARLY CONSULTATIONS WITH THE U.S. AND AN EFFORT TO REACH
AGREEMENT IN THE C-20 ON THIS UNDERSTANDING. END SUMMARY.
2. EC COMMISSION AND PERMREP SOURCES HAVE BRIEFED THE
MISSION ON THE MEETING OF EC FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL
BANK GOVERNORS AT ZEIST. THESE CONTACTS EITHER WERE PRESENT AT
THE MEETING OR HAVE HAD ACCESS TO PARTICIPANTS. THEIR
ACCOUNTS ARE GENERALLY IN ACCORD WITH THAT OBTAINED BY
EMBASSY THE HAGUE.
3. EC COMMISSION SOURCES TELL US THAT THE UNDERSTANDING
REACHED BY THE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS
CORRESPONDS TO THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN A REPORT PREPARED BY
THE CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS FOR THE ZEIST MEETING. THIS
REPORT STATED THAT CENTRAL BANKS SHOULD BE PERMITTED BOTH
TO SELL AND TO BUY GOLD EITHER AMONGST EACH OTHER OR ON
THE MARKET AT AT PRICE OTHER THAN THE OFFICIAL PRICE AND
THAT, FURTHER, THEY SHOULD HAVE COMPLETE FREEDOM OF
DECISION TO BUY OR TO SELL WITHOUT OBLIGATION TO ENGAGE
IN ANY PARTICULAR TRANSACTION. COMMISSION SOURCES
STRESSED THE POINT THAT ANY TRANSACTIONS IN GOLD WOULD BE
STRICTLY OPTIONAL. THEY ALSO NOTED THAT PARTICIPANTS IN
THE ZEIST MEETING MADE CLEAR THEIR INTENTION TO AVOID ANY
REMONETIZATION OF GOLD. OUR CONTACTS SAID THERE WAS
AGREEMENT THAT THE CENTRAL BANKS AS A WHOLE WOULD NOT BE
NET ACCUMULATORS OF GOLD BUT THERE WAS NO QUESTION OF
MAKING THIS OBLIGATION BINDING ON INDIVIDUAL CENTRAL BANKS
AS INDICATED IN REF A.
4. THE MINISTERS AND GOVERNORS ALSO DISCUSSED CERTAIN
SPECIFIC FEATURES THAT MIGHT EVENTUALLY BE INTRODUCED INTO
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
PAGE 03 EC BRU 02457 251418Z
THE SYSTEM BUT THAT WOULD REQUIRE FURTHER STUDY. THESE ARE:
A) AMOVABLE BAND COORDINATED BY THE CENTRAL BANKS WITH A
CEILING FOR PURCHASES AND A FLOOR FOR SALES; AND B) SOME
KIND OF AN INTERMEDIARY THROUGH WHICH MARKET INTERVENTIONS
MIGHT BE CHANNELED--POSSIBLY IN THE FORM OF A BUFFER STOCK.
THESE "MODALITIES" WILL ALSO BE DISCUSSED WITH THE U.S.,
BUT THEY ARE NOT CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF ANY
REVISED ARRANGEMENTS FOR GOLD.
5. AS REPORTED IN REF A, THE MEETING DEPUTIZED DUTCH
FINANCE MINISTER DUISENBERG AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNOR
ZIJLSTRA TO CONSULT WITH U.S. TREASURY AND FED OFFICIALS.
WE UNDERSTAND DUTCH TREASURER GENERAL OORT WAS ALSO
CHARGED WITH RAISING THE POINTS AT THE C-20 DEPUTIES
MEETING MAY 7. THE DUTCH WILL REPORT ANY U.S. REACTION
TO THE EC FINANCE MINISTERS, WHO ARE SCHEDULED TO MEET
AS A COUNCIL IN BRUSSELS MAY 20. IF THERE IS NO AGREEMENT
IN THE C-20, THE POINTS OF UNDERSTANDING REACHED AT ZEIST
WOULD NOT AUTOMATICALLY BE APPLIED WITHIN THE EC. RATHER,
THE ENTIRE ISSUE WOULD HAVE TO BE RECONSIDERED.
6. COMMISSION SOURCES TELL US THE PARTICIPANTS AT ZEIST
AGREED THAT CONTACTS ENVISAGED WITH THE U.S. WOULD BE IN
THE FRAMEWORK OF DISCUSSION AND CONSULTATION RATHER THAN
NEGOTIATION. (THE FRENCH REPORTEDLY SPECIFICALLY STATED
THERE SHOULD BE NO "NEGOTIATIONS", AND THIS POINT WAS
ACCEPTED BY THE OTHER PARTICIPANTS.)
7. IN COMMENTING ON THE DISCUSSIONS AT ZEIST, ONE SOURCE
WHO WAS PRESENT AT THE MEETING TOLD US THE VIEW WAS WIDE-
SPREAD THAT AS A PRACTICAL MATTER, CENTRAL BANKS WOULD NOT
SELL GOLD UNLESS THEY KNEW THEY COULD BUY. FREEDOM TO
SELL BUT NOT TO BUY WAS MEANINGLESS SINCE THE PRICE COULD
NOT BE CONTROLLED AND A NATION THAT SOLD GOLD WOULD
SIMPLY UNDERCUT ITS OWN POSITION IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY
BUYING. MOREOVER, IF THE PHASING OUT OF HOLD WAS TO
BE ORDERLY, CENTRAL BANKS WOULD REQUIRE FREEDOM TO
OPERATE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. FINALLY, THE POINT WAS
MADE AT THE MEETING THAT NON-MONETARY COMMODITIES ARE
BOTH BOUGHT AND SOLD ON THE MARKET AND THAT GOLD, IF
REGARDED AS A NON-MONETARY COMMODITY, SHOULD BE TREATED
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
PAGE 04 EC BRU 02457 251418Z
SIMILARLY. MYERSON
LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
NNN
---
Capture Date: 01 JAN 1994
Channel Indicators: n/a
Current Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Concepts: POLICIES, MINISTERIAL MEETINGS, BANKERS, GOLD CRISIS, GOLD TRANSACTIONS
Control Number: n/a
Copy: SINGLE
Draft Date: 25 APR 1974
Decaption Date: 01 JAN 1960
Decaption Note: n/a
Disposition Action: RELEASED
Disposition Approved on Date: n/a
Disposition Authority: golinofr
Disposition Case Number: n/a
Disposition Comment: 25 YEAR REVIEW
Disposition Date: 28 MAY 2004
Disposition Event: n/a
Disposition History: n/a
Disposition Reason: n/a
Disposition Remarks: n/a
Document Number: 1974ECBRU02457
Document Source: CORE
Document Unique ID: '00'
Drafter: n/a
Enclosure: n/a
Executive Order: N/A
Errors: N/A
Film Number: D740097-1114
From: EC BRUSSELS
Handling Restrictions: n/a
Image Path: n/a
ISecure: '1'
Legacy Key: link1974/newtext/t19740415/aaaaamzv.tel
Line Count: '155'
Locator: TEXT ON-LINE, ON MICROFILM
Office: ACTION EUR
Original Classification: LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
Original Handling Restrictions: n/a
Original Previous Classification: n/a
Original Previous Handling Restrictions: n/a
Page Count: '3'
Previous Channel Indicators: n/a
Previous Classification: LIMITED OFFICIAL USE
Previous Handling Restrictions: n/a
Reference: A) THE HAGUE 2042
Review Action: RELEASED, APPROVED
Review Authority: golinofr
Review Comment: n/a
Review Content Flags: n/a
Review Date: 01 APR 2002
Review Event: n/a
Review Exemptions: n/a
Review History: RELEASED <01 APR 2002 by boyleja>; APPROVED <10 JUN 2002 by golinofr>
Review Markings: ! 'n/a
US Department of State
EO Systematic Review
30 JUN 2005
'
Review Media Identifier: n/a
Review Referrals: n/a
Review Release Date: n/a
Review Release Event: n/a
Review Transfer Date: n/a
Review Withdrawn Fields: n/a
Secure: OPEN
Status: NATIVE
Subject: EC FINANCE MINISTERS' DISCUSSION OF GOLD, APRIL 22-23
TAGS: EFIN, XG, EEC
To: STATE
Type: TE
Markings: Declassified/Released US Department of State EO Systematic Review 30 JUN
2005
You can use this tool to generate a print-friendly PDF of the document 1974ECBRU02457_b.
The formal reference of this document is 1974ECBRU02457_b, please use it for anything written about this document. This will permit you and others to search for it.
Submit this story
References to this document in other cables | References in this document to other cables |
---|---|
1974THEHA02042 1976ATHENS02042 1976THEHA02042 |
If the reference is ambiguous all possibilities are listed.
Help Expand The Public Library of US Diplomacy
Your role is important:
WikiLeaks maintains its robust independence through your contributions.
For other ways to donate please see https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate