You are here
Pimco's El-Erian complains about market manipulation by central banks -- and the FT prints it!
Beware the 'Central Bank Put'
By Mohamed El-Erian
Financial Times, London
Monday, January 7, 2013
The investment recommendations made by many financial commentators are now dominated by cross-asset class relative valuation rather than the fundamentals of the investment itself. A typical refrain runs something like this: Buy X because it is cheaper than other things out there.
This is an understandable approach as unusual central bank activism has artificially elevated certain asset prices. Yet the dominance of this increasingly popular advice comes with potential risks that need to be well understood and well managed.
Several asset classes now have highly manipulated prices due to experimental central bank activities, both actual and signalled. The more this happens, the more investors come under pressure to migrate to higher risk investments in search of returns. Ben Bernanke, Federal Reserve chairman, said as much at his latest press conference, noting that the aim of policy is to "push" investors to take more risk. True to his wish, many pundits seem eager to discard fundamentals in favour of searching for (and levering) anything that "yields" more.
... Dispatch continues below ...
How to profit in the new year with silver --
and which stocks to buy now
Future Money Trends is offering a special 16-page silver report with our forecast for 2013 that includes profiles of nine companies and technical analysis of their stock performance. Six of the companies have market capitalizations of less than $800 million and one company has a market cap of only $30 million. The most exciting of these companies will begin production in a few weeks and has a market cap of just $150 million.
Half of all proceeds from the sale of this report will be donated to the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee to support its efforts exposing manipulation and fraud in the gold and silver markets.
To learn about this report, please visit:
This situation is reminiscent of 2006-07, when hyperactive liquidity factories also pushed some asset prices to artificial levels, thus contributing to a generalised and indiscriminate compression of risk premia. In the process, investors were comforted by the then-popular notion of the Great Moderation (the belief that central banks and governments had conquered the business cycle). We all know what happened next.
This historical parallel is not perfect, however. As I wrote in March 2007 in the Financial Times, the liquidity factories then were endogenous to the markets. Leverage was created by private participants (particularly investment banks) taking on greater risk.
Today the major liquidity factory is exogenous to the markets. The sizeable balance sheet expansion is in the official sector, most importantly, central banks. Just a few weeks ago the Federal Reserve announced it is targeting a further $1 trillion in asset purchases in 2013, representing a third of its existing balance sheet. Other central banks -- particularly the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, and the European Central Bank -- are also expected to expand their balance sheets again in the months ahead.
This makes the current cycle relatively less dangerous given the greater inherent stability of a central bank's balance sheet. Unlike private-sector institutions, it is hard to force a central bank to delever without some dramatic combination of exchange rate, inflationary and political pressure.
But, critically for both economic prospects and investors, greater relative stability does not guarantee absolute stability. There is a limit to how far central banks can divorce prices from fundamentals. Moreover, as illustrated in the minutes of the latest Fed meeting, there is already discomfort among some policy makers due to the costs and risks of unconventional policies. Also, at some point, and it is hard to tell when exactly, the private sector will increasingly refuse to engage in situations deemed excessively artificial and overly rigged.
This is particularly relevant for asset classes (such as high-yield corporate bonds, equities and certain highly leveraged products) outside the direct influence of central banks -- an influence that is applied through direct market purchases and forward-looking policy guidance. With the weaker central bank impact, prices need to have greater consistency with the realities of balance sheets and income statements.
In such a world, investors should expect security and sector selections to get repeatedly overwhelmed by macro correlations. Since a growing number of asset classes are now exposed in a material fashion to the belief that central banks will deliver macroeconomic as well as market outcomes, investors have assumed considerable macro-driven correlations across their holdings. Moreover, with seemingly endless liquidity injections, the scaling of such exposure can easily disconnect from the extent to which prices deviate from fundamentals.
Investors should also expect greater volatility in their portfolios as a whole. With the Fed's move to quantitative thresholds, and particularly its use of historical unemployment data (as opposed to the forecasts that will be used for inflation, the other threshold), routine data releases will lead to greater fluctuations in asset prices.
Have no doubt: Central banks are both referees and players in today's markets. With 2013 starting with so many liquidity-induced deviations, investors would be well advised to take greater care when pursuing opportunities that rely mainly on the "central bank put."
Mohamed El-Erian is the chief executive and co-chief investment officer of Pimco.
* * *
Join GATA here:
Vancouver Resource Investment Conference
Sunday-Monday, January 20 and 21, 2013
Vancouver Convention Centre West
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
* * *
Support GATA by purchasing DVDs of our London conference in August 2011 or our Dawson City conference in August 2006:
Or by purchasing a colorful GATA T-shirt:
Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:
Help keep GATA going
GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:
To contribute to GATA, please visit:
GoldMoney adds Singapore vaulting option
In addition to its precious metals storage facilities in Hong Kong, Switzerland, Toronto, and the United Kingdom, now with GoldMoney you can store gold and silver in Singapore in a high-security vault operated by Brink's Singapore Pte Limited. To celebrate the launch of this storage option, GoldMoney is offering a discount on buy and exchange fees at this vault for any orders above US$10,000 (or the equivalent) until January 31, 2013. Tthe gold buy rate is 0.98%, while the silver rate is 1.99%. Metal exchanges into Brink's Singapore will also be discounted for this period and will be charged at 0.78% for gold and 1.75% for silver. Simply place your order online and the above rates apply automatically until January 31, 2013, 15.00 UK time. To find out more about the new vault, please visit:
GoldMoney customers can take delivery of any number of gold, silver, platinum, and palladium bars from any GoldMoney vault, as well as personally collect their bars stored in the Hong Kong, Switzerland, and U.K. vaults.
It's easy to open an account, add funds, and liquidate your investment. For more information, visit:
|Previous Article||Next Article|
|Mike Kosares: John Law reincarnated, and Er...||Report commissioned by World Gold Council h...|